Cut height calibration (IHS Springback)

I calibrated the cutting height for my Crossfire Pro this weekend and I thought other folks might be interested in what I found.

First off, I had never calibrated my cut height previously in any way. I never thought about it, I guess my excuse would be “doesn’t the initial height sensing and torch height control take care of all that?” I think the answer is two part:

  1. the initial height sensing (IHS) does take care of that, but it makes an assumption about how much backlash there is, and that might be wrong for your particular machine
  2. torch height control (THC) is completely separate from IHS and is about what happens (or doesn’t happen) dynamically while the cut is being made to adjust for irregularities in the material being cut

Since I do all of my regular cutting with Fusion 360, I figured it would be best to take some G code from there and see what it looks like. Here’s the relevant bit where it probes to locate the material:

G92 Z0.          (wherever the torch happens to be, call that Z=0)
G38.2 Z-5. F100. (move the torch -5 inches in Z at 100ipm, stop on contact)
G38.4 Z0.5 F20.  (move the torch 0.5 inches in Z at 20ipm, stop on contact break)
G92 Z0. 
G0 Z0.04         (IHS Springback + Backlash)
G92 Z0. 

So the first few lines do most of the work, then the 5th line accounts for the difference between what we wanted (the exact height of the material) and what IHS actually did, due to springback, backlash, etc. In this case it says “move the torch up .04” and then it will be at exactly zero." If you look at the settings dialog when you run the postprocessor in Fusion 360 you’ll see:

image

which by default specifies an IHS Springback of .020", which is not the same as the .040" in the G code. I did experiments with changing the springback specified in the dialog, and always got a consistent extra .020" in the generated G code – for example, if I specified springback of .037 in the dialog I’d find .057 in the G code. I’m not sure what that’s about, but as long as you take it into account :person_shrugging:

I took the G code from one of my programs and cut it down it to include only the first height probe and no cutting at all so that I could just calibrate my IHS springback without having anything else going on.

(v1.6-af)
G90 G94
G17
G20
H0

(Probe it)
G92 Z0.
G38.2 Z-5. F100.
G38.4 Z0.5 F20.
G92 Z0.
(G0 Z0.04) (IHS Springback + Backlash)
G92 Z0.
G0 Z0.063  (Cut Height)

M30
(PS40)

After some fooling around I found that the correct springback setting for my table in the G code is .009, in other words .031" less than what I had been getting by default. Put another way, without doing any calibration I had been specifying a cut height of 0.063" but was getting 0.094", which I thought was pretty surprising.

Wrapping this up, my final setup is to tell the postprocessor in Fusion 360 that the IHS Springback is -0.011 inches, which results in an actual springback compensation in the generated G code of +0.009 inches.

I hope this helps somebody else out!

8 Likes

The post processor adds.020" for IHS backlash by default. Sheetcam doesn’t have a field for that value, so it’s always .020". I just reduce the cut height by the necessary amount to achieve a .060" cut height.

Most people don’t do any testing and just assume that the IHS is going to give them the correct height.

2 Likes

i found this out by checking the cut height with feeler gauges, i had to change all my tools in sheetcam so my cut height was .048" to get the .063" actual cut height.

Hi, what was the “fooling around” process you used to measure and determine your cut height and calibration? I must have missed that part…

This -

I took the G code from one of my programs and cut it down it to include only the first height probe and no cutting at all so that I could just calibrate my IHS springback without having anything else going on.

(v1.6-af)
G90 G94
G17
G20
H0

(Probe it)
G92 Z0.
G38.2 Z-5. F100.
G38.4 Z0.5 F20.
G92 Z0.
(G0 Z0.04) (IHS Springback + Backlash)
G92 Z0.
G0 Z0.063  (Cut Height)

M30
(PS40)

Run that code and measure the height of the torch with a feeler gauge. The difference between the actual height and .063" is the amount you need to adjust to get the correct height.

6 Likes

ahh ok - thank you. very helpful

1 Like

This thread is incredibly helpful. I think this is a problem that is causing my consumables to wear fast. My piercing visually looks way too high, and once it is cutting, the torch height control takes over and cuts are great.

I have been cutting alot of .049 to .087 aluminum, and this turned a lightbulb on for me. The springback of the actual material changes alot as the cut project progresses.

thanks,
Kyle

1 Like

this offset should be applied to the pierce height settings as well, shouldn’t it?

1 Like

Yes it should be applied to all heights that you set in your CAM setup.

2 Likes