I don’t think anyone ever said these systems were plug-and-play. They require some effort by the user. It’s hard to believe that someone will drop 3 or 4 thousand dollars on a plasma CNC setup without either knowing something about them or having done a fair amount of research.
The basics aren’t that complicated although some skill with a computer is required. Not a ton as there are lots of folks here who learned by doing with the Crossfire. They weren’t the ones looking for it to be spoon fed though.
There are posts here about the workflow, very basic step-by-step (I know because I wrote one way back in the original Crossfire days). But here’s a recap so you don’t have to do any searching.
CNC requires 3 things - a design, toolpathing that creates machine commands and a computer to take those commands and drive a set of motors.
That is CAD (computer aided design), CAM (computer aided machining) and CNC (computer numericical control).
The Crossfire (and nearly all other tables like this) is the CNC part of the process. FireControl (or Mach3 for the older machines) is the application that runs on the computer to handle the CNC execution of driving the motors.
Mach 3 by the way, although it’s pretty common in the industry is only one of the applications that can be used for CNC processing in the industry. But it’s old and hasn’t been updated in years. It’s “end of life” as the computer industry calls it. It’s not being updated to do anything more than it does today (and did last year or the year before) and won’t be updated for any machine’s new capabilities.
The CAD and CAM portions of the process are up to the user to choose. Langmuir is pretty open in terms of not forcing just a single set of programs to do this work. If you’re an Adobe Illustrator guy you can use that for design. If you’re a CorelDraw guy you can use that. If you’re an Inkscape guy, that will work. If you’re an Autocad guy that works. If you’re a Fusion 360 guy that works too. Pick one. They range from free to $$$$. Your call and you’re the one who has to decide what you are going to be doing and what design tool capabilities you’ll need.
The most complex capable tools can handle almost any job but they are complicated, hard to learn and usually expensive. The simpler tools can do things like art work, sign projects and flat sheet designs but won’t be doing complex 3D parts design with automated materials analysis. They don’t take as long to learn, but they’re not going to suck the wants out of your mind and turn it into a design in your computer, effort is still required.
Here’s the easy decision tree:
I want to…
- Make artwork, use other people’s designs, make signs and I don’t already do any computer design work,
Then, go with INKSCAPE for CAD (it’s free, tons of YouTube videos to learn from)
- Make complicated 3D parts, I’m computer savvy and I don’t mind spending a few bucks for a powerful computer and have time to learn powerful software but aren’t really doing any computer design right now,
Then, go with FUSION 360 (it can be free, but that’s limited or about $500/yr)
- Either of the above but I’ve been using Adobe Illustrator (or AutoCad or CorelDraw) for years and years and am really comfortable with that software,
Then, use the software you already know for the CAD side of things
- Grab things out of the box and just go with it to create all the cool things I see at craft fairs, fab shops and on the web but I don’t want to bother learning all the bits & bobs needed to master design software,
Then just hire someone else to make things because this stuff takes effort - magic does not spill out of the computer like rainbows and fairy dust.
So now that you’ve got the CAD side picked, you need step 2 (CAM) where you tell the computer how you want the design to be produced (cut) and create the commands for the CNC step. The input of the CAM program is the SVG or DXF file from the CAD side and the output is a set of computer code (called G-Code) that tells the machine how to move the torch around to cut your design out. There is something called a “post-processor” that the CAM program uses to match the computer commands it creates to the capabilities of the specific CNC machine you’re using - Crossfire G-Code isn’t the same as Arclight, Hypertherm, Piranha or anyone else’s G-Code because the machines are different. You’ll need to use the Crossfire post-processor to get G-Code that the Crossfire CNC will be able to use correctly.
This has just a couple of decision possibilities.
I want to…
- Not spend any money on the software for this
Then, pick Fusion 360 free edition and pay the price in the learning curve (btw, if you’re doing commercial work where you sell the stuff you make, you’ll have to pay for the annual subscription for Fusion)
- Have the simplest straightforward process for telling the computer what to do
Then, spend $140 and buy Sheetcam and another couple/few hours learning (YouTube or folks here) how to setup your toolpaths (the way you want the computer to cut your design)
Now we’re down to the last piece, step 3, the CNC part. This is really easy with the Crossfire because you don’t have to make any decisions - it’s all based on what machine you have.
-
On original Crossfire or Crossfire XL uses Mach3 as its CNC application. You will need to spend $175 on a Mach 3 license to run an reasonable design (the free license is limited to 500 lines of G-Code which isn’t much).
-
A late model Crossfire or Crossfire Pro uses FireControl as its CNC application. This is included with your purchase so no additional licensing expense. This is clearly spelled out on the Langmuir website. To be fair, if you only read that a year ago and didn’t spend any time on the forums since then, you might think Mach 3 was used because for a few early months of the Pro development process they were still thinking Mach 3 would be needed. Very quickly though they switched to their own CNC application (which is good because it’s tuned to the machines we’re running - it’s not a general purpose application for lots of machines and if there’s a problem they fix it vs.
).
That’s it. All the decisions you need to make. You will need to learn some new software and you’ll really need to learn how plasma cutting works with the balance between material, power and speed but that’s not unique to Langmuir. If you’re not willing to do this, then go back to the step that recommends you hire someone for all this thought, learning and you know, actual work.
With all of these decisions made the process is simple:
DESIGN (CAD) --> SVG or DXF file --> CAM --> G-Code file --> CNC --> magic cutouts on your table
To address your rant specifically,
-
THIS IS JUST TYPICAL OF LANGMUIR - yes it is and thank goodness. Ever try calling Artisoft and getting Mach 3 fixed? (ask them about why you can’t have <1 seconds as a pierce time unless you use milliseconds…take your time, we’ll all be here when you get back with the answer…) BTW, UPPERCASE IS TYPICAL OF SOMEONE MORE INTERESTED IN BLAMING SOMEONE ELSE FOR THEIR PROBLEMS THAN A SOLUTION TO THEM
, but in the spirit of the holidays and hoping that the next person struggling with this might find it useful, I’ve gone ahead and posted this so they can find their way through the forest.
-
all these patches and add ons and plug ins! - again, yep, that’s good. Someone is supporting the software. Problems are identified and problems are fixed. Have you gotten the answer yet to when Mach 3 is going to have that bug fixed? No? Didn’t think so. Don’t worry, we’ll wait for you but we won’t be holding our breath. Oh, by the way, Mach 3 has a dozen different post processor file “plug ins” depending on the CAM or machine you’re targeting. Plug-ins are not a Langmuir failure.
-
why can’t it all be simple - because it’s not. You’re doing something pretty complicated. You might as well ask why can’t you paint like DaVinci or sing like Adele or golf like Tiger Woods or drive like Kyle Busch. If it were simple and easy and no work, everyone would do it. Effort is the deciding factor between people who are good at something and those that aren’t. I’m pretty sure that’s a Kindergarten lesson, but it’s worth repeating. It sucks, we’d all like to be perfect at everything but the reality is you have to work at it. If it’s not worth the effort to you, then go back to the step where I recommended you hire someone because you’ll only be frustrated.