Is anybody using Sheetcam?

Is anybody on here using it ? Pros/ cons ? Looking for feed back. Thx

Yes, quite a few on here are using sheetcam and I am still learning how it works but I am having good success with it so far. I tried fusion in the beginning, then found out that I could use the same software that I have used for the last few years, Vinylmaster pro 4, for the design then import it into sheetcam and create the toolpath. I just figured it was easier to learn sheetcam rather than have to learn the design software all over again.

That’s about all that I can offer since I never used Fusion for any of the items that I have cut.

Good luck.

2 Likes

True. A search on Sheetcam here on the forum has a bunch of hits for various posts.

I use both but Sheetcam is my primary for when all I am doing is toolpaths.

Downloaded fusion before table arrived and spent 20 hrs on videos MacWhorter puts out. Worked with cad software (auto cad based) for years. Found fusion anti intuitive and overly confusing. Probably great for 3d modeling i.e. router or 3d printer but unnecessary for 2d plasma work. Downloaded sheet cam and was up in running in less than 2 hrs. Very simple and have had great results. Would highly recommend.

2 Likes

I can import my image, trace it in inkscape, export it to sheetcam, run toolpath, post the file, save the job, and have the machine running before fusion even fires up… Did a video to prove it once… Think it took less that 3 minutes… Ah, here it is…

3 Likes

What all these guys said. I started out using Fusion and even though I really liked the GUI, it was just too much for me. And a big factor for me was the cloud storage. I want my stuff locally - not on someone else’s server.

Sheetcam is owned by a guy who responds to emails. He is personable, professional and realistic. Sheetcam is basic, but has the features most of us need. It’s not a design suite, it’s basically nesting software on steroids without all the fanfare.

1 Like

Great demo, now I have a better idea of how to use inkscape.

Thanks

2 Likes

Fusion is good for what it was designed for, 3D. for the 2d stuff we are doing, especially art stuff, it’s overkill and way to complicated. I’m a CAD designer as well, so I don’t mean to complicated to use, but I don’t need to add constraints and rules to geometry to cut out a lion head… I even use inkscape on some of my more precision stuff, it can be done using snap, and construction lines. Biggest downfall to inkscape for that kinda stuff is not being able to use a simple command to fillet a corner, or bevel it. It can be done, just not the most user friendly… Square brackets with holes… piece of cake… I’ve even done some other non-basic stuff with inkscape. If you learn the translate function in inkscape, you can draw just about anything you like accurately… Like this…





1 Like

ok… gotta know. why’d you block in the side of the blower?

Made it into a fume sucker for my hilly billy paint booth… It’s not loaded with crap anymore, have the filter in the suction at the top, and a box fan at the bottom blowing up to get the fumes to the top… Works pretty good, cost less than $100 to make… Including the oven that is underneath that you cant see…

3 Likes

I have to second that comment as I am newb/rookie to this and it was helpful to see some of the process and capabilities.

I see the blower is opened on both sides. sometimes hill billies have the most expedient solutions.

1 Like

Have to agree and admit, Sheetcam much much easier then fusion. Fusions benefits show up when utilizing a thick part and u want to see 3D with protrusions. Otherwise sheetcam is extremely easy, simple and efficient for parts we are all doing here. Con to it is really no tech support available. So u will have to use forums and videos for all your questions til your fluent with it. Sheetcam is pretty much a “dumb” program so u can’t really change anything. So whatever goes in will come out, so make sure your dxf or svg files have all of their welds done properly before exporting.